N-o1 NAMING INTELLIGENCE — EXPERIMENTAL MODEL
Top 500 Namespace Value Index
500 namespace names. One transparent comparison model.
Explore an experimental comparison of established domain extensions and potential namespace names.
.COM leads the model. .WEB occupies a fixed reference position at #46, anchored to its reported $171.4 million acquisition cost.
The index combines an editorial ordering with a mathematical value curve. It explores hypothetical whole-namespace scenarios under equivalent commercial rights; it does not establish market prices.
Editorial seed order—not a fully scored commercial ranking. This is a curated set, not an exhaustive ranking of every extension.
50× spread selected · COM #1: $8.570 billion · WEB #46: $171.400 million. Changing the ratio changes scenario values, never ranks.
| Rank | Namespace / Name | Status | Category / Market | Modelled Namespace Value ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #51 | .crm | Applied-for / proposed | Business | $110.978 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .crm · position, evidence and calculationPosition #51 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #16. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 51) / 45) = $110.978 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #52 | .llm | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $101.738 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .llm · position, evidence and calculationPosition #52 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #17. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 52) / 45) = $101.738 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #53 | .wealth | Applied-for / proposed | Finance | $93.267 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .wealth · position, evidence and calculationPosition #53 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #18. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 53) / 45) = $93.267 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #54 | .official | Applied-for / proposed | Digital Identity | $85.501 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .official · position, evidence and calculationPosition #54 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #19. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 54) / 45) = $85.501 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #55 | .crypto | Applied-for / proposed | Finance | $78.382 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .crypto · position, evidence and calculationPosition #55 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #20. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 55) / 45) = $78.382 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #56 | .machine | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $71.856 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .machine · position, evidence and calculationPosition #56 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #21. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 56) / 45) = $71.856 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #57 | .platform | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $65.873 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .platform · position, evidence and calculationPosition #57 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #22. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 57) / 45) = $65.873 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #58 | .mind | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $60.388 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .mind · position, evidence and calculationPosition #58 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #25. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 58) / 45) = $60.388 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #59 | .agentic | Applied-for / proposed | Agents | $55.360 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .agentic · position, evidence and calculationPosition #59 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #26. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 59) / 45) = $55.360 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #60 | .gaming | Applied-for / proposed | Gaming | $50.751 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .gaming · position, evidence and calculationPosition #60 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #27. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 60) / 45) = $50.751 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #61 | .intelligence | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $46.525 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .intelligence · position, evidence and calculationPosition #61 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #28. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 61) / 45) = $46.525 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #62 | .invest | Applied-for / proposed | Investment | $42.651 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .invest · position, evidence and calculationPosition #62 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #29. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 62) / 45) = $42.651 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #63 | .human | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $39.100 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .human · position, evidence and calculationPosition #63 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #30. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 63) / 45) = $39.100 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #64 | .ops | Applied-for / proposed | Agents | $35.845 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .ops · position, evidence and calculationPosition #64 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #31. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 64) / 45) = $35.845 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #65 | .data | Operating TLD | Technology | $32.860 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .data · position, evidence and calculationPosition #65 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #32. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 65) / 45) = $32.860 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #66 | .bit | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $30.124 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .bit · position, evidence and calculationPosition #66 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #33. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 66) / 45) = $30.124 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #67 | .brand | Applied-for / proposed | Generic / Universal | $27.616 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .brand · position, evidence and calculationPosition #67 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #34. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 67) / 45) = $27.616 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #68 | .identity | Applied-for / proposed | Digital Identity | $25.316 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .identity · position, evidence and calculationPosition #68 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #35. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 68) / 45) = $25.316 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #69 | .bitcoin | Applied-for / proposed | Finance | $23.209 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .bitcoin · position, evidence and calculationPosition #69 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #36. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 69) / 45) = $23.209 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #70 | .tools | Operating TLD | Agents | $21.276 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .tools · position, evidence and calculationPosition #70 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #38. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 70) / 45) = $21.276 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #71 | .node | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $19.505 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .node · position, evidence and calculationPosition #71 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #39. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 71) / 45) = $19.505 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #72 | .search | Operating TLD | Technology | $17.881 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .search · position, evidence and calculationPosition #72 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #40. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 72) / 45) = $17.881 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #73 | .brain | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $16.392 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .brain · position, evidence and calculationPosition #73 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #41. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 73) / 45) = $16.392 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #74 | .stack | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $15.027 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .stack · position, evidence and calculationPosition #74 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #42. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 74) / 45) = $15.027 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #75 | .gen | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $13.776 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .gen · position, evidence and calculationPosition #75 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #43. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 75) / 45) = $13.776 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #76 | .science | Operating TLD | AI & Intelligence | $12.629 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .science · position, evidence and calculationPosition #76 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #45. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 76) / 45) = $12.629 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #77 | .creator | Applied-for / proposed | Creator Economy | $11.577 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .creator · position, evidence and calculationPosition #77 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #47. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 77) / 45) = $11.577 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #78 | .host | Operating TLD | Technology | $10.613 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .host · position, evidence and calculationPosition #78 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #48. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 78) / 45) = $10.613 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #79 | .software | Operating TLD | Technology | $9.730 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .software · position, evidence and calculationPosition #79 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #49. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 79) / 45) = $9.730 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #80 | .quantum | Applied-for / proposed | AI & Intelligence | $8.920 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .quantum · position, evidence and calculationPosition #80 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #50. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 80) / 45) = $8.920 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #81 | .auth | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $8.177 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .auth · position, evidence and calculationPosition #81 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #51. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 81) / 45) = $8.177 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #82 | .analytics | Operating TLD | AI & Intelligence | $7.496 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .analytics · position, evidence and calculationPosition #82 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #52. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 82) / 45) = $7.496 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #83 | Operating TLD | Technology | $6.872 millionIllustrative USD scenario | |
About .email · position, evidence and calculationPosition #83 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #53. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 83) / 45) = $6.872 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #84 | .solar | Operating TLD | Energy | $6.300 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .solar · position, evidence and calculationPosition #84 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #54. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 84) / 45) = $6.300 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #85 | .commerce | Applied-for / proposed | Business | $5.775 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .commerce · position, evidence and calculationPosition #85 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #55. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 85) / 45) = $5.775 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #86 | .hub | Applied-for / proposed | Business | $5.294 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .hub · position, evidence and calculationPosition #86 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #56. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 86) / 45) = $5.294 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #87 | .yes | Applied-for / proposed | Generic / Universal | $4.854 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .yes · position, evidence and calculationPosition #87 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #57. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 87) / 45) = $4.854 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #88 | .mobile | Operating TLD | Technology | $4.449 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .mobile · position, evidence and calculationPosition #88 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #58. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 88) / 45) = $4.449 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #89 | .technology | Operating TLD | Technology | $4.079 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .technology · position, evidence and calculationPosition #89 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #59. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 89) / 45) = $4.079 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #90 | .earth | Operating TLD | Energy | $3.739 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .earth · position, evidence and calculationPosition #90 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #60. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 90) / 45) = $3.739 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #91 | .hosting | Operating TLD | Technology | $3.428 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .hosting · position, evidence and calculationPosition #91 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #61. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 91) / 45) = $3.428 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #92 | .network | Operating TLD | Technology | $3.143 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .network · position, evidence and calculationPosition #92 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #62. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 92) / 45) = $3.143 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #93 | .pay | Operating TLD | Finance | $2.881 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .pay · position, evidence and calculationPosition #93 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #63. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 93) / 45) = $2.881 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #94 | .systems | Operating TLD | Technology | $2.641 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .systems · position, evidence and calculationPosition #94 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #64. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 94) / 45) = $2.641 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #95 | .src | Applied-for / proposed | Technology | $2.421 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .src · position, evidence and calculationPosition #95 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #65. Evidence and verificationThe exact string appears in ICANN’s official Reveal Day contention-set snapshot checked on 24 October 2026. This is application evidence, not approval or delegation, and not a complete application register.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 95) / 45) = $2.421 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #96 | .bank | Operating TLD | Finance | $2.220 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .bank · position, evidence and calculationPosition #96 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #66. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 96) / 45) = $2.220 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #97 | .care | Operating TLD | Health | $2.035 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .care · position, evidence and calculationPosition #97 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #67. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 97) / 45) = $2.035 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #98 | .energy | Operating TLD | Energy | $1.865 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .energy · position, evidence and calculationPosition #98 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #68. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 98) / 45) = $1.865 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #99 | .loan | Operating TLD | Finance | $1.710 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .loan · position, evidence and calculationPosition #99 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #69. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 99) / 45) = $1.710 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
| #100 | .security | Operating TLD | Technology | $1.568 millionIllustrative USD scenario |
About .security · position, evidence and calculationPosition #100 · Inherited naming-list orderThis entry fills an unoccupied position from the existing published naming-list order, after case-insensitive deduplication and retention of the fixed and seeded entries. Its original Naming Intelligence rank is #70. Evidence and verificationIANA lists an active generic delegation. Delegation does not establish public registration availability, transferable commercial rights or financial performance.
Selected scenario calculation$171,400,000 × 50((46 − 100) / 45) = $1.568 million The 50× COM-to-WEB ratio is an assumption. Full precision is retained in the calculation; displayed figures are rounded. Very small positive scenarios use scientific notation (for example, e−6 means millionths of a dollar). View existing Naming Intelligence record → | ||||
How this model works
- COM is fixed at #1 by model design.
- WEB is fixed at #46 using the acquisition cost reported in the supplied Domain Name Wire article.
- The first 40 positions are an editorial seed selected by the owner. They are not outputs of financial analysis.
- Remaining positions inherit the existing naming-list order after reconciliation. Seeded names and WEB are retained first; the remaining unique published names fill unoccupied positions in order until there are exactly 500.
- A constant compounded curve connects the assumed COM value to the WEB reference and extends through rank 500:
171400000 × multiplier ^ ((46 − rank) / 45). - The multiplier is a user-selected assumption, not an observed market relationship. Available scenarios are 10×, 50× (default) and 100×.
- Acquisition cost, current market value and future investment return are different measures. The reference is a reported cost, not an independently checked current value.
- Existing registries, country-code namespaces and hypothetical names have different rights and economics. Equivalent commercial rights are a scenario assumption, not a claim about actual transferability.
Reported acquisition-cost reference ↗ · Domain Name Wire, 23 October 2026; checked 2026-10-24. No underlying filing was independently checked for this index.
Status verification and registration context
IANA root database ↗ confirms active delegations as of 2026-10-24. “Operating TLD” here means an active root delegation, not proof that unrestricted public registrations are available. Country-code market labels follow the geographic designation, even where an extension is marketed internationally.
ICANN Reveal Day contention-set snapshot ↗ supplies exact-string application evidence, checked 2026-10-24. It is not a complete register of applications or their final outcomes. Unconfirmed strings remain Unverified and appear as names without a dot.
DNIB Q3 2026 registration context ↗ · published 22 October 2026, checked 2026-10-24. Its leading reported registration group includes COM, CN, DE, NET, ORG, UK, XYZ, RU, TOP and NL. This context does not generate this page’s seed order or dollar curve.
1 entries have unverified status. Review all unverified names. Evidence is a dated snapshot, not live research. No registration totals, cash flows, company values or application counts are inferred by this model. Scenario values are not added together.
Explore your category identity
N-o1.com offers exclusive, renewable identities combining a name or category with an ambition to lead.
The namespace scenarios above are separate from the pricing and valuation methods used for individual N-o1.com identities.